HARVEY PROJECT

What is the Harvey Project?
Why the Name?
Philosophy
History
Harvey Project FAQ
Organization
Project Administration
Examples
Development Area
Bulletin Board
Communication
Peek at our new Web Site

no blackboard

What is the Harvey Project?

back to top

Why the Name?

Portrait of William Harvey Sir William Harvey, physician to King Charles I, was a famous teacher of physiology and author of de Motu Cordis, a masterpiece of clear exposition which demonstrated for the first time the circulation of the blood. Since the goal of this project is to teach physiology as clearly as possible, Harvey is an appropriate model. The fact that Harvey was also an invisible rabbit is apposite for a course that exists only in cyberspace. Harvey the rabbit

back to top

Philosophy

back to top

History

The Harvey Project was launched in early July, 1998 and so has essentially no history yet, but a very interesting future.

back to top

Harvey Project FAQ

Has anything like this ever been done before?

In higher education, no, not to my knowledge. We will be the pioneers and, in the measure that we succeed, the inspiration for faculty in other fields. In software engineering yes, collaborative, public-domain development is a well known and highly successful development model. The linux operating system, the Apache web server, the Unix sendmail program and now the Netscape browser are examples.

Why use digital media?

Digital, "knowledge media" such as CD-ROMs and the Internet are quickly transforming the way we teach science. A lecturer explaining the ear can show his class an accurate, 3-dimensional cochlear model and rotate it on screen. When describing the cardiac cycle, he can show them an NMR movie of a normal, beating heart as a video clip. Students learning about blood pressure can investigate for themselves the effects of vasodilation, cardioacceleration and loss of blood using a simulation. However well a professor can teach these subjects with a blackboard and overhead transparencies, he can be more effective by using appropriate digital materials. The trouble is that such materials, though clearly superior, are generally not available yet and are difficult to develop. That is the raison d'être of the Harvey Project.

Why use the Internet?

The wide and growing acceptance of the Internet makes it the best medium for instructional development, particularly for public domain materials. Web-based materials are more easily updated and have a much lower distribution cost than CD-ROMs. The only advantages CD-ROMs enjoy over the web are greater bandwidth -- seldom a major issue in physiology -- and portability. The latter is offset by the fact that materials designed for a web browser can generally be stored on a local hard disk, or even distributed by CD-ROM. Wholesale delivery of classroom materials over the Internet will have a profound effect on higher education, its students and its institutions.

Why public domain?

Since there is no concept of geographical distance on the Internet, professors will choose to use the best materials that are available to them. What good will it do me or anyone else if the neurophysiology site I spend thousands of hours developing turns out to be only second best, and is generally ignored? On the other hand, no academic institution or granting agency appears ready to step forward and fund the development of a truly world-class site for teaching physiology or any other subject. Indeed, there is no worn path showing how to do this because it hasn't been done yet, in any field. Only if we work together can we build something that will be head and shoulders above everything else and set a new standard. Working in the public domain fosters a spirit of openness and cooperation that will attract others to the enterprise and make the work move faster. If we faculty don't rise to this challenge we may find the opportunity taken out of our hands by a Prentice-Hall, a Microsoft or a Time Warner.

Why should faculty or institutions not contributing to this project benefit from our work?

That's the whole point. That's what education is all about.

Shouldn't this kind of thing be left to the textbook companies?

  1. I don't believe that a proprietary solution will ever be completely adequate or overwhelmingly successful. I have never seen a physiology textbook I was entirely happy with. Many hands working together are always stronger than a few working in self-interest.
  2. What we're undertaking is much more than an online version of a textbook. Its interactivity will set it apart from any textbook, and its use of simulations, 3-D models, current research and scrupulous accuracy will set it apart from any commercial physiology CD-ROM, although particular CDs may incorporate some of these features.
Although textbook companies might feel we are trying to take away their business, I don't think that is the case; I think we are just offering them a new niche. I have never known a student who didn't want a hard copy of all class materials off the web, nor a software product that didn't spawn a half dozen how-to manuals. Instead of investing huge development costs to produce $80 textbooks that are purchased by only a few students, publishers will be able to sell every undergraduate physiology student every semester a $15 or $20 manual printed on newsprint with little or no development overhead.

What skills do I need to participate?

Whatever you can contribute. If you are a skilled teacher, scholar or technologist, and especially if you combine more than one of these roles, Harvey needs you. The skills we need are, first, a sense of what students can "get" easily and what is intrinsically hard for them to grasp, educational design talent, a sense of visual style, a deep understanding of current research, a knack for explaining how things work, and medical illustration skills. On the technical side, we will need programming ability in Java and Perl, HTML and javascript design talent, database and system administration skills, and maybe even a lawyer or two to draft a license agreement. The point of a collaboration is that no one has or needs to have all the necessary skills. We will adopt a constructive peer review process where, if someone thinks he can improve on something, he will try to do so. Differences of opinion about pedagogy, design or implementation will be settled by reasoned debate, followed by a vote.

What's in it for me?

  1. long hours of unpaid work
  2. the challenge of finding the best way to get students to understand your corner of physiology
  3. the pleasure of collaborating with like-minded colleagues committed to a common goal
  4. the satisfaction of making a lasting impact on how physiology (and perhaps other sciences) will be taught from now on
  5. a share of whatever glory may eventually accrue
We will, of course, apply collectively or individually for whatever grant support we can find. Personally, I can't think of many worthier projects so I'm sure there will be support in the future. We must be prepared to build first and be supported after, however, and I doubt the level of support will ever be commensurate with our efforts.

What is this project really all about?

"The purpose of computing is insight, not numbers."
-- R. W. Hamming, Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers
The purpose of the Harvey project is teaching and learning, not technology.

back to top

Organization

back to top

Project Administration

back to top

Examples

The goal of this project is to take full advantage of the interactivity of the Internet so as to foster an excitement and depth of understanding that conventional textbooks or lecture materials cannot achieve. The following examples, though a bit unpolished, show how the digital medium is capable of much more than transcription a printed page.

back to top

Development Area

click here

back to top

Communication

back to top


This page last updated 17.II.99 by Robert Stephenson.